<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1971 Demon vs. The Dodge Demon Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cmoney</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator>Cmoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-4712</guid>
		<description>put the e-brake on the other side of the cup holders so driftin is easier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>put the e-brake on the other side of the cup holders so driftin is easier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEMON freak</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-4705</link>
		<dc:creator>DEMON freak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-4705</guid>
		<description>just saved a 71 demon from being crush out of a wrecking yard in the middle of no where perchase the car for 200.00 canadian funds,now has for the THING they call demon concept hope they lose the plan and paper work for that one, what a mess,reminds me of the remake of the charger 4 DOORS wtf man what a disgrace they should be a shame,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just saved a 71 demon from being crush out of a wrecking yard in the middle of no where perchase the car for 200.00 canadian funds,now has for the THING they call demon concept hope they lose the plan and paper work for that one, what a mess,reminds me of the remake of the charger 4 DOORS wtf man what a disgrace they should be a shame,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sizzler Man</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-4671</link>
		<dc:creator>Sizzler Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-4671</guid>
		<description>Boy if you could only bring back the body line with the up to date drive train I would buy one but not like this demon now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy if you could only bring back the body line with the up to date drive train I would buy one but not like this demon now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demon Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>Demon Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That&#039;s sad.  No point in pulling out the jaws of life if you wreck that new Demon.  If you&#039;re going to remake the car---remake the car, not the name.  I miss my old Demon, it would set fire to the streets,stop on a dime and hand out change.  What a fine, simple car it was.  It didn&#039;t need anything but the muscle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That&#8217;s sad.  No point in pulling out the jaws of life if you wreck that new Demon.  If you&#8217;re going to remake the car&#8212;remake the car, not the name.  I miss my old Demon, it would set fire to the streets,stop on a dime and hand out change.  What a fine, simple car it was.  It didn&#8217;t need anything but the muscle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-3240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-3240</guid>
		<description>Just required a green 71 dodge demon from a auction. Paid a very very very good price for her. The guy didn&#039;t take care of her.. she is rusted in the back ends, but interior is awesome. Restoring her and she will be the only demon in town. So game on and thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just required a green 71 dodge demon from a auction. Paid a very very very good price for her. The guy didn&#8217;t take care of her.. she is rusted in the back ends, but interior is awesome. Restoring her and she will be the only demon in town. So game on and thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy P</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-3161</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-3161</guid>
		<description>OMG!!! I am a BIG fan of the `71 Dodge Demon and what the heck was they thinking by doing this?? What happened to the basic roots of my Demon?
There is NOTHING that even remotely comes close to the original look of a Demon. What are they trying to reproduce ? THIS REALLY SUCKS !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG!!! I am a BIG fan of the `71 Dodge Demon and what the heck was they thinking by doing this?? What happened to the basic roots of my Demon?<br />
There is NOTHING that even remotely comes close to the original look of a Demon. What are they trying to reproduce ? THIS REALLY SUCKS !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david french</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>david french</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>Kind of a dumb review of 71 Demon...which was a duster...which was a swinger/dart from the b pillar forward.  The new Demon is at least a dedicated design although the dodge 300, truck etc. grill looks goofy at best on a small car design from the nose back it looks like a 350Z...these people at Cerebrus are obviously idiots and going back to what killed GM and Chrysler...design by committee.  Try to be everything to everybody and you end up being nothing to no body.  The Crossfire was better looking by far and at least original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of a dumb review of 71 Demon&#8230;which was a duster&#8230;which was a swinger/dart from the b pillar forward.  The new Demon is at least a dedicated design although the dodge 300, truck etc. grill looks goofy at best on a small car design from the nose back it looks like a 350Z&#8230;these people at Cerebrus are obviously idiots and going back to what killed GM and Chrysler&#8230;design by committee.  Try to be everything to everybody and you end up being nothing to no body.  The Crossfire was better looking by far and at least original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordcarcus</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>Lordcarcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>HA Whatever. Should&#039;ve never done it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA Whatever. Should&#8217;ve never done it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hates modernization</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>hates modernization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>whoever comes up with the new dodges as a serious lack of comprehending that we want a 2 door MUSCLE car. no frills just function and power. if i wanted frills i would buy a merceedes. so dodge if you ever see this take the challenger put the 6.1 in and manual everything else. we don&#039;t even need badging. look to the past. if someone bought high horsepower then that was all they wanted. people would buy your cars so much faster and you wouldn&#039;t be trying to outsource to india. you&#039;d be competing with toyota. WHO MAKES MONEY!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoever comes up with the new dodges as a serious lack of comprehending that we want a 2 door MUSCLE car. no frills just function and power. if i wanted frills i would buy a merceedes. so dodge if you ever see this take the challenger put the 6.1 in and manual everything else. we don&#8217;t even need badging. look to the past. if someone bought high horsepower then that was all they wanted. people would buy your cars so much faster and you wouldn&#8217;t be trying to outsource to india. you&#8217;d be competing with toyota. WHO MAKES MONEY!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOLECULE</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>MOLECULE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/02/1971-demon-vs-the-dodge-demon-concept/#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>They did a wonderful job with the 08/09 Challenger. I would love to see them retro the &#039;71 Demon with the 5.7 or 6.1. that would be a ground pounding beast! They can make the Demon concept if they want, but they shouldn&#039;t call it a Demon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did a wonderful job with the 08/09 Challenger. I would love to see them retro the &#8216;71 Demon with the 5.7 or 6.1. that would be a ground pounding beast! They can make the Demon concept if they want, but they shouldn&#8217;t call it a Demon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
