<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodge Viper Sold?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:45:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brennon</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/comment-page-1/#comment-4937</link>
		<dc:creator>brennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/#comment-4937</guid>
		<description>dodge needs 2 stay where its at</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dodge needs 2 stay where its at</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/comment-page-1/#comment-4888</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/#comment-4888</guid>
		<description>With government ownership and their propensity to put us all in versions of &#039;smart cars&#039; I don&#039;t see a future for Viper with Chrystler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With government ownership and their propensity to put us all in versions of &#8216;smart cars&#8217; I don&#8217;t see a future for Viper with Chrystler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diehardfan</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/comment-page-1/#comment-1933</link>
		<dc:creator>diehardfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/#comment-1933</guid>
		<description>if anyone thinks that chrysler would sale dodge to Nissan they need to take a go look at dodge&#039;s sale reports</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if anyone thinks that chrysler would sale dodge to Nissan they need to take a go look at dodge&#8217;s sale reports</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustbury.com &#187; Chrysler and [someone], sitting in a tree</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>dustbury.com &#187; Chrysler and [someone], sitting in a tree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/2008/09/dodge-viper-sold/#comment-893</guid>
		<description>[...] assuming Jeep goes to Hyundai, Nissan could reposition Dodge as strictly a truck brand &#8212; the Viper will be spun off to a third party, the Challenger will run its course, the rest don&#8217;t matter &#8212; and use the Chrysler [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] assuming Jeep goes to Hyundai, Nissan could reposition Dodge as strictly a truck brand &#8212; the Viper will be spun off to a third party, the Challenger will run its course, the rest don&#8217;t matter &#8212; and use the Chrysler [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

