<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Dodge Charger &#8211; At Least, How We&#8217;d Like it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oshabooboo</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4772</link>
		<dc:creator>Oshabooboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4772</guid>
		<description>This is the sexiest car in the whole freakinn world its taking my breath away. I frigiin love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the sexiest car in the whole freakinn world its taking my breath away. I frigiin love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eriel London</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>Eriel London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>This is a nice looking car! I hope that the price is worth it&#039;s value. It looks like there is great potential for future value. Dodge, keep up the good work!

@ErielLONDON</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice looking car! I hope that the price is worth it&#8217;s value. It looks like there is great potential for future value. Dodge, keep up the good work!</p>
<p>@ErielLONDON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bayless</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4752</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bayless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4752</guid>
		<description>flippn&#039; badass. This is what the automotive industry should be doing, creating cars with style, attitude and individualism instead of the homogenized versions that come down the generic tailpipe of mediocrity. I always thought it was shameful to apply the Charger moniker to a damn 4 door! If the new chargers will look like this I will greatly consider a purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flippn&#8217; badass. This is what the automotive industry should be doing, creating cars with style, attitude and individualism instead of the homogenized versions that come down the generic tailpipe of mediocrity. I always thought it was shameful to apply the Charger moniker to a damn 4 door! If the new chargers will look like this I will greatly consider a purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick and Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick and Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>I have a 1968 Charger R/T, as well as having had a 1969 R/T.
Some years ago, Chrysler promised a new Charger that would pay homage to the 68-70 Chargers.
   What we got was a shortened Dodge Magnum.
   It is all well and good that the brain trust at Chrysler brought back a Charger, but what a price to pay.  But what the hell, the Chrysler brain trust as well as the Fords and GM always did what was best for their own pocket, just buy it and shut up.
   I personly do not understand what it is with them refusing to do what they promised, and make a real, modern retro Charger.
   I guess that it is just an ego thing with them.
   I have had a charger since 1969, I like the Chargers, I just wish that Chrysler cared about us, the people who spend their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 1968 Charger R/T, as well as having had a 1969 R/T.<br />
Some years ago, Chrysler promised a new Charger that would pay homage to the 68-70 Chargers.<br />
   What we got was a shortened Dodge Magnum.<br />
   It is all well and good that the brain trust at Chrysler brought back a Charger, but what a price to pay.  But what the hell, the Chrysler brain trust as well as the Fords and GM always did what was best for their own pocket, just buy it and shut up.<br />
   I personly do not understand what it is with them refusing to do what they promised, and make a real, modern retro Charger.<br />
   I guess that it is just an ego thing with them.<br />
   I have had a charger since 1969, I like the Chargers, I just wish that Chrysler cared about us, the people who spend their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAMERON RANDOLPH</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>CAMERON RANDOLPH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>MARK I DISAGREE NO ONE WANTED THAT JUNK PILE THEY CALLED A CAR BECAUSE IF YOU HAVENT NOTICED THE 1990S DIDNT HAVE A GOOD TIME PERIOD SO QUIT TALKING CRAP THAT YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT P.S I SHOULD KNOW IM A MOPAR MAN I GREW UP BUILDING MOPARS WITH MY FATHER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARK I DISAGREE NO ONE WANTED THAT JUNK PILE THEY CALLED A CAR BECAUSE IF YOU HAVENT NOTICED THE 1990S DIDNT HAVE A GOOD TIME PERIOD SO QUIT TALKING CRAP THAT YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT P.S I SHOULD KNOW IM A MOPAR MAN I GREW UP BUILDING MOPARS WITH MY FATHER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAMERON RANDOLPH</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4740</link>
		<dc:creator>CAMERON RANDOLPH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4740</guid>
		<description>I THINK THAT CHARGER CONSEPT WOULD MAKE A GOOD CAR .BECAUSE MY FAMILY WOULD RATHER HAVE A OLD SCHOOL FELLING WITH THE NEW AND NOT HAVE 4DOORS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I THINK THAT CHARGER CONSEPT WOULD MAKE A GOOD CAR .BECAUSE MY FAMILY WOULD RATHER HAVE A OLD SCHOOL FELLING WITH THE NEW AND NOT HAVE 4DOORS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euclide Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>Euclide Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://s42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/?action=view&amp;current=chargerconcept.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://s42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/?action=view&amp;current=chargerconcept.jpg" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euclide Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>Euclide Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>[IMG]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/chargerconcept.jpg[/IMG]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[IMG]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/chargerconcept.jpg[/IMG]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euclide Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Euclide Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>trying to post pic&gt;???of what I mentioned earlier???

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/chargerconcept.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trying to post pic&gt;???of what I mentioned earlier???</p>
<p><a href="http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/chargerconcept.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/chargerconcept.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euclide Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.dodgepedia.org/2009/02/2010-dodge-charger/comment-page-1/#comment-4725</link>
		<dc:creator>Euclide Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodgepedia.org/?p=276#comment-4725</guid>
		<description>Now this concept;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://s42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/?action=view&amp;current=chargerconcept.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,

Is somewhat more acceptable, except I would like to see a split grill on the front of her. The R/T stripe goes all the way down, the rear lights are so so, would like it shaped more like the old style.

Also if the rear window was recessed, then it would be some nice. I stretch this picture, and it&#039;s state right now with the changes I would like to see, it would be a pretty good 2010 Charger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this concept;</p>
<p><a href="http://s42.photobucket.com/albums/e327/scooter_dukes/?action=view&amp;current=chargerconcept.jpg" rel="nofollow"></a>,</p>
<p>Is somewhat more acceptable, except I would like to see a split grill on the front of her. The R/T stripe goes all the way down, the rear lights are so so, would like it shaped more like the old style.</p>
<p>Also if the rear window was recessed, then it would be some nice. I stretch this picture, and it&#8217;s state right now with the changes I would like to see, it would be a pretty good 2010 Charger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
